首页> 外文OA文献 >Does aging affect preferences for welfare spending? A study of peoples’ spending preferences in 22 countries, 1985-2006
【2h】

Does aging affect preferences for welfare spending? A study of peoples’ spending preferences in 22 countries, 1985-2006

机译:老龄化会影响福利支出偏好吗? 1985 - 2006年对22个国家人民消费偏好的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A recurrent assertion is that aging will intensify age-related conflict over public budget allocation. If people are led by their self-interest, the young will prioritize public education services, while the elderly will demand better pensions and health-care services. Addressing this issue requires longitudinal survey data and estimation of age (life-cycle), period and cohort effects. Except for a few of studies based on US data, such analyses are non-existent.We use repeated cross-section survey-data for 22 countries. Respondents are classified into ten-year age-groups and birth decades, and we estimate a regression model explaining respondents’ public spending preferences. When period and cohort effects are taken into account, elderly people want less education spending, and more health care and pension spending. These life-cycle effects vary considerably between countries, but are generally quite small. Preferences also appear mostly unrelated to left-right party choice.
机译:一个经常性的断言是,老龄化将加剧与年龄有关的公共预算分配冲突。如果人们以自己的利益为主导,那么年轻人将优先考虑公共教育服务,而老年人则需要更好的养老金和医疗服务。解决此问题需要纵向调查数据并估算年龄(生命周期),时期和队列影响。除了基于美国数据的一些研究之外,这种分析是不存在的。我们使用22个国家/地区的重复横截面调查数据。受访者分为十年年龄段和出生十年,我们估计出一个回归模型来解释受访者的公共支出偏好。考虑到周期和队列影响,老年人希望减少教育支出,而增加医疗保健和养老金支出。这些生命周期影响在国家之间差异很大,但通常很小。首选项也似乎与左右方选择无关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sørensen, Rune Jørgen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号